or I FUCKING HATE SUBSTACK I FUCKING HATE SUBSTACK I FUCKING HATE SUBSTACK
You're a good writer. Nicely done.
How a typical interaction with a sourcefag goes;
"Here is my argument, wherein I use facts and logic."
"ERM but do you have a SOURCE and it better be HECKING PEER REVIEWED."
"Well it shant be necessary but here are 12 different sources that show how you are a retard."
The sourcefag now has two moves
1. "ERM I am NOT READING ALL THAT so YOU'RE WRONG."
2. "SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU FUCKING FUCK!"
Old forms getting deconstructed before BTFO’d :) currently waiting for the dust to settle, model to converge, so it goes
You’re not wrong, you have edge and style, nice tension, keep going
Sincerely, ¡¿RUCRES?! x O!TPYG x Get@Me.Bro
What I like about your stuff is that it’s deliberately abrasive in a way that inevitably filters people yet is ultimately sincere
I just fucking want people to fucking think. If you boil everything down I do, that's the actual goal. Agree, disagree, whatever. I just want people to *think*.
A better class of villain.
You're a good writer. Nicely done.
How a typical interaction with a sourcefag goes;
"Here is my argument, wherein I use facts and logic."
"ERM but do you have a SOURCE and it better be HECKING PEER REVIEWED."
"Well it shant be necessary but here are 12 different sources that show how you are a retard."
The sourcefag now has two moves
1. "ERM I am NOT READING ALL THAT so YOU'RE WRONG."
2. "SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU FUCKING FUCK!"
Old forms getting deconstructed before BTFO’d :) currently waiting for the dust to settle, model to converge, so it goes
You’re not wrong, you have edge and style, nice tension, keep going
Sincerely, ¡¿RUCRES?! x O!TPYG x Get@Me.Bro
What I like about your stuff is that it’s deliberately abrasive in a way that inevitably filters people yet is ultimately sincere
I just fucking want people to fucking think. If you boil everything down I do, that's the actual goal. Agree, disagree, whatever. I just want people to *think*.
A better class of villain.